Sunday, May 9, 2010

Thank you for visiting my Blog Posts this semester!


I would like to thank all of you who stopped by to read my blog posts this semester.
I enjoyed sharing my thoughts and practices with everyone. It was great fun!

Goodbye Everyone and Enjoy Your Summer!
Lorrie

Instructor Online Presence

When speaking with students on the phone, many times I have heard comments on how they are not used to the help they are receiving, or the timely grading of the assignments or my Instructor online presence.
This semester one of my students emailed me about something I wrote in his Lab Feedback. He said that he did not think he could ask me for help since this is an "online course". Despite emails that tell everyone to write or call for help, he still believed that he had to go it alone. After my reply encouraging him to seek assistance, that's just what he did for the remainder of the semester.

I like my students to be aware of my online presence. I tell them in my very first Welcome Email that they will notice me online everyday and often. I always hope they will connect my dedication to them and the course with expectations for student presence and performance.

Lorrie

What if it doesn't work?

Sometimes I have created what I believed was a thought-provoking and insightful discussion topic that would be both interesting and also easy for my students to research, only to have it fall flat on its face.

Either the goals were somehow confusing, the topic not as interesting for students as it was for me, or the hints in my own introductory post directions were not read, in which case science was "misapplied".

What can an instructor do if a topic that was expected to be just "great"...is far from it?

Tweak it or Trash it.

Editing the criteria and/or providing concrete examples of expected outcomes might help.
However, there are just sometimes when what seems like an awesome topic (or slant on a topic) just has to be trashed in favor of one that will produce the expected class participation and enthusiasm.

Lorrie

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Maintaining Standards for Discussion Posts

I had composed this post about my standards in the discussion area by the second week of the Spring semester but I never published it. I guess I was concerned that maybe I was being too O.C.
But after seeing the thread of posts in the Faculty Discussion area I thought about my own post once again and decided to publish it after all.

So here goes:

Okay...there's My Space, Face book, Twitter, all sorts of personal blog sites, cell phone text messages and then there are D2L CCCOnline courses.
This is college!

And so, Research Discussions in my classes are expected to be written using proper spelling and grammar. A uniform font style and size is encouraged. A post written in ALL CAPS or all bold type is not allowed. Also not acceptable are posts decorated with brightly colored fonts or fonts which change font family and size frequently within a single message.
Capitals must begin a sentence and a period or other punctuation mark must end a sentence.
The first person "I" must not read as "i".

If a post is difficult to read and follow then an edit is requested.

My insistence on both discussion content and format does not win overwhelming student applause the first 2 weeks of a semester but I stand firm in requiring that discussion posts look more professional than your average "anyone can post here" blog.

By the second unit the majority of student research posts look very professional. Yay! Mission accomplished!

Lorrie

A Compliment? I think so!

What instructor doesn’t like it when a student emails to say that he/she enjoyed the class and that you are a great teacher?

I received an interesting “compliment” and I do take it to be one.

I was told that I was the most legit online instructor that the person ever had but that she thanked me for it.

My personal professional mission statement from the 1970’s to present is:
Never sell anyone’s ability short. Hold the standards high; the majority of people will rise up to meet them.
Those that do not completely meet them will probably still achieve more than they thought was possible.

Lorrie